Court Terms Law Assignment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Court Terms Law Assignment - question Paper ExampleThe party presenting the offer to the offeree foundation realize that the offeree did non have the intention of sign language the contract, by verifying the consent of the offeree before allowing him or her to sign the form. At the same time, the offeror can test the offerees knowledge of the contents of the basis and conditions, by asking sample questions from the toll. The third style to test the offeree is by explaining the consequences of signing, and the implication of signing without consent. The estimableness of the terms will enable the offeree to be serious and eliminate all jokes when it comes to signing the consent. If the offeree insists on signing, the offeror provides enough time to the offeree to go through the clauses of the engagement before finally signing. The offeror can select the most critical clauses and expose them as matters of antecedence to the offeree before allowing him or her to sign. All action s must be before signing because after then, the signed terms are valid for critical transactions. In this case, the offeree will have no option other than to guide the entire terms and conditions.Exercise 3 ConsiderationAgreement fails to get consideration if thither is wishing of consideration. At the same time, if there is an additional term that was not present from the onset, the rule of acceptance does not agree with the agreement in a case where A enforces a promise by fashioning offers to B and B does not agree to the terms and conditions of the agreements.... All actions must be before signing because after then, the signed terms are valid for critical transactions. In this case, the offeree will have no option other than to strike the entire terms and conditions. Exercise 3 Consideration Agreement fails to get consideration if there is lack of consideration. At the same time, if there is an additional term that was not present from the onset, the rule of acceptance doe s not agree with the agreement in a case where A enforces a promise by making offers to B and B does not agree to the terms and conditions of the agreements. In this case, A promises to present the terms and conditions for amendment, and B confirms that he or she has read the terms and understood them before signing the agreement. It lacks consideration because there is no consent of the offeree. Exercise 4 Agreement The agreement that A and B entered into could certainly not be enforced, since it lacked consideration. This is because it lacked acceptance due to unclear terms and conditions. Nevertheless, according to the theory of consent, offeror A would succeed in enforcing the agreement after B has read and signed the consent. This theory requires the offeree B to prove the following That he or she has read every section of the terms and conditions of the agreement That he or she is serious and is in his or her right conscious That he or she has understood the terms and conditio ns of the agreement That he or she is interested in the contract and has willingly accepted the terms and conditions. Exercise 5 Reality of coincide and Fraud Perpetration Parties to a binding contract can perpetrate frauds and forgeries through impersonation or use of false unwarranted